Site Title
2011 Barton Bulldogs
Barton Bulldogs vs UNC Pembroke
1
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -001
ISO 10000, 1/125 sec at f / 18, 145 mm
2
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -002
ISO 10000, 1/125 sec at f / 18, 145 mm
3
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -003
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 7.1, 145 mm
4
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -004
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 7.1, 145 mm
5
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -005
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 7.1, 145 mm
6
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -006
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 135 mm
7
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -007
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 135 mm
8
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -008
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 5.0, 135 mm
9
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -009
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 5.0, 135 mm
10
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -010
ISO 12800, 1/160 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
11
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -011
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 14, 93 mm
12
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -012
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 8.0, 200 mm
13
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -013
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 8.0, 200 mm
14
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -014
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 8.0, 200 mm
15
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -015
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 8.0, 200 mm
16
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -016
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 8.0, 200 mm
17
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -017
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 18, 98 mm
18
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -018
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 7.1, 200 mm
19
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -019
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 7.1, 200 mm
20
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -020
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 7.1, 200 mm
21
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -021
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 7.1, 200 mm
22
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -022
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 7.1, 200 mm
23
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -023
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.2, 200 mm
24
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -024
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.2, 200 mm
25
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -025
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.2, 200 mm
26
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -026
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.2, 200 mm
27
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -027
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.2, 200 mm
28
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -028
ISO 12800, 1/160 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
29
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -029
ISO 12800, 1/125 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
30
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -030
ISO 12800, 1/125 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
31
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -031
ISO 12800, 1/125 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
32
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -032
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
33
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -033
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
34
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -034
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
35
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -035
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
36
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -036
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.5, 105 mm
37
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -037
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
38
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -038
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
39
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -039
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
40
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -040
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1, 70 mm
41
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -041
ISO 12800, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
42
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -042
ISO 12800, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
43
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -043
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.5, 145 mm
44
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -044
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.2, 135 mm
45
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -045
ISO 12800, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
46
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -046
ISO 12800, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
47
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -047
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 93 mm
48
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -048
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
49
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -049
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.0, 98 mm
50
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -050
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.0, 98 mm
51
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -051
ISO 12800, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 88 mm
52
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -052
ISO 12800, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 88 mm
53
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -053
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.2, 88 mm
54
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -054
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 88 mm
55
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -055
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 88 mm
56
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -056
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
57
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -057
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
58
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -058
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
59
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -059
ISO 12800, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
60
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -060
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 70 mm
61
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -061
ISO 12800, 1/160 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
62
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -062
ISO 12800, 1/160 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
63
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -063
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
64
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -064
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.5, 110 mm
65
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -065
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
66
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -066
ISO 12800, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
67
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -067
ISO 12800, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
68
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -068
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
69
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -069
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
70
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -070
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.5, 200 mm
71
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -071
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.5, 200 mm
72
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -072
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
73
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -073
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
74
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -074
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
75
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -075
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.0, 70 mm
76
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -076
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.0, 93 mm
77
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -077
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 93 mm
78
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -078
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
79
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -079
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
80
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -080
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
81
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -081
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.5, 200 mm
82
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -082
ISO 12800, 1/125 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
83
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -083
ISO 12800, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
84
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -084
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
85
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -085
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
86
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -086
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
87
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -087
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 70 mm
88
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -088
ISO 12800, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
89
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -089
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
90
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -090
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
91
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -091
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
92
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -092
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
93
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -093
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 128 mm
94
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -094
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
95
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -095
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
96
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -096
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
97
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -097
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
98
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -098
ISO 12800, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
99
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -099
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
100
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -100
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 70 mm
101
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -101
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 70 mm
102
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -102
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
103
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -103
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
104
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -104
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
105
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -105
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
106
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -106
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 83 mm
107
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -107
ISO 12800, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
108
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -108
ISO 12800, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
109
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -109
ISO 12800, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
110
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -110
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
111
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -111
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
112
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -112
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
113
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -113
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
114
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -114
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
115
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -115
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
116
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -116
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
117
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -117
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
118
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -118
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
119
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -119
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
120
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -120
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
121
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -121
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
122
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -122
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.0, 70 mm
123
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -123
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 70 mm
124
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -124
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 88 mm
125
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -125
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.2, 88 mm
126
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -126
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 105 mm
127
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -127
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 98 mm
128
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -128
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 98 mm
129
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -129
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 135 mm
130
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -130
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 135 mm
131
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -131
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 135 mm
132
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -132
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 135 mm
133
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -133
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 135 mm
134
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -134
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 135 mm
135
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -135
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
136
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -136
ISO 12800, 1/160 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
137
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -137
ISO 12800, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
138
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -138
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
139
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -139
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
140
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -140
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
141
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -141
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
142
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -142
ISO 12800, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 93 mm
143
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -143
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 78 mm
144
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -144
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 78 mm
145
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -145
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 78 mm
146
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -146
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 78 mm
147
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -147
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 78 mm
148
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -148
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 78 mm
149
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -149
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.0, 78 mm
150
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -150
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.2, 128 mm
151
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -151
ISO 12800, 1/160 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
152
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -152
ISO 12800, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
153
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -153
ISO 12800, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
154
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -154
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
155
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -155
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
156
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -156
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
157
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -157
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
158
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -158
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
159
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -159
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
160
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -160
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
161
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -161
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
162
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -162
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
163
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -163
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
164
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -164
ISO 12800, 1/80 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
165
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -165
ISO 12800, 1/80 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
166
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -166
ISO 12800, 1/80 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
167
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -167
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
168
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -168
ISO 12800, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
169
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -169
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
170
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -170
ISO 12800, 1/125 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
171
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -171
ISO 12800, 1/125 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
172
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -172
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 135 mm
173
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -173
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.0, 135 mm
174
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -174
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.0, 135 mm
175
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -175
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.0, 98 mm
176
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -176
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.0, 98 mm
177
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -177
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.0, 98 mm
178
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -178
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
179
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -179
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.2, 70 mm
180
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -180
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.2, 70 mm
181
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -181
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.2, 70 mm
182
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -182
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.2, 70 mm
183
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -183
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.0, 70 mm
184
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -184
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.0, 70 mm
185
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -185
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.0, 70 mm
186
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -186
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.2, 70 mm
187
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -187
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.2, 70 mm
188
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -188
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
189
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -189
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
190
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -190
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
191
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -191
ISO 12800, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
192
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -192
ISO 12800, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
193
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -193
ISO 12800, 1/160 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
194
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -194
ISO 12800, 1/160 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
195
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -195
ISO 12800, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 98 mm
196
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -196
ISO 12800, 1/80 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
197
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -197
ISO 12800, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 98 mm
198
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -198
ISO 12800, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 98 mm
199
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -199
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 93 mm
200
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -200
ISO 12800, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 93 mm
201
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -201
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 105 mm
202
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -202
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 105 mm
203
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -203
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 98 mm
204
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -204
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 98 mm
205
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -205
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 98 mm
206
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -206
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
207
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -207
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
208
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -208
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
209
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -209
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
210
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -210
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
211
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -211
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
212
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -212
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
213
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -213
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
214
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -214
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
215
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -215
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
216
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -216
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.0, 93 mm
217
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -217
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
218
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -218
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 135 mm
219
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -219
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 135 mm
220
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -220
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
221
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -221
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
222
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -222
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
223
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -223
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
224
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -224
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
225
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -225
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
226
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -226
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
227
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -227
ISO 12800, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
228
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -228
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
229
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -229
ISO 12800, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
230
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -230
ISO 12800, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
231
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -231
ISO 12800, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
232
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -232
ISO 12800, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
233
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -233
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
234
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -234
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
235
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -235
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
236
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -236
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
237
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -237
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
238
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -238
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
239
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -239
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
240
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -240
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
241
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -241
ISO 12800, 1/2500 sec at f / 3.2, 135 mm
242
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -242
ISO 12800, 1/2500 sec at f / 3.2, 135 mm
243
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -243
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
244
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -244
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
245
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -245
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
246
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -246
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
247
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -247
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
248
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -248
ISO 12800, 1/2500 sec at f / 4.5, 70 mm
249
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -249
ISO 12800, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
250
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -250
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm