Back David Rembecki
Pages:<2 3 4 5 6 7
541
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -541
ISO 1000, 1/200 sec at f / 18, 180 mm
542
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -542
ISO 1000, 1/200 sec at f / 16, 120 mm
543
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -543
ISO 1000, 1/200 sec at f / 14, 200 mm
544
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -544
ISO 1000, 1/200 sec at f / 20, 270 mm
545
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -545
ISO 1000, 1/200 sec at f / 22, 180 mm
546
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -546
547
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -547
548
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -548
549
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -549
550
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -550
551
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -551
ISO 1000, 1/200 sec at f / 25, 180 mm
552
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -552
ISO 1000, 1/200 sec at f / 29, 180 mm
553
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -553
554
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -554
555
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -555
556
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -556
557
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -557
ISO 1000, 1/200 sec at f / 29, 170 mm
558
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -558
559
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -559
ISO 1000, 1/200 sec at f / 20, 170 mm
560
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -560
ISO 1000, 1/200 sec at f / 18, 170 mm
561
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -561
562
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -562
563
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -563
ISO 1000, 1/200 sec at f / 18, 200 mm
564
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -564
565
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -565
566
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -566
567
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -567